The sound, like Iván Fischer’s interpretation, avoids hard edges and apocalyptic excess, leading to a certain loss of peripheral vision. Deryck Cooke once described the first movement of the Third as ‘the most original and flabbergasting thing Mahler ever conceived’. But how vulgar ought it to sound? Reluctant to parade its roughest edges and disinclined to hurry, Fischer instead elicits a range of pristine, jewel-like colour that leaves its fabric refreshed.
While the consensual yet individualistic grain of Fischer’s music-making presents parallels with Claudio Abbado’s late work in Lucerne, his rubato is more insistent: Leonard Bernstein without the angst. His finale can boast neither the instantaneous rapture of the former nor the self-conscious solemnity of the latter, in spite of which the argument is transformed, lightened, some will say liberated in his hands. Those who feel that Mahler miscalculated the insistent grandeur of his endings will appreciate the way Fischer, like Abbado, makes the texture less brazen at the close, muffling the timpani into the bargain. Those who do not may also resist the manner in which Fischer defangs the sweatier, more demotic episodes of the first movement despite a sometimes breathtaking variety of affect.
The rural idyll is most potent and incontrovertibly ‘right’ in the inner movements, all maximally transparent. Difficult to imagine the avowedly summery third and its distanced solos being bettered any time soon. If Gerhild Romberger seems rather forwardly balanced in the Friedrich Nietzsche setting, her robust delivery is presumably meant to fit with the outdoors quality of the rest. She also has to contend with the slurred cries of the night-bird as suggested by the woodwind’s hinaufziehen (‘pull up’) markings. After that the choral contributions maintain an exalted standard without sounding overly genteel.
Why nitpick? You’d have to be hypercritical indeed not to rejoice in the appearance of a studio recording made the old-fashioned way with exquisite care, multiple takes and not a trace of routine in the playing. The only disappointment is that there can’t be much Mahler left to come from this source. The Eighth would seem to be incompatible with both the conductor’s angle on the composer and the economic constraints under which his orchestra must operate. He has not, as far as I know, tackled Cooke’s performing version of the Tenth. This Third is a must-have.
You can read the original article here.
The Mahler 3 recording of the Budapest Festival Orchestra was listed among the top10 new recordings chosen by Gramophone magazin. You can reach the full list here.
